That seems like a good option! Though I like the idea of there being something they're both interested in and it kind being a stalemate of sorts, a cold war per se. Both sides waiting to make the first move but still defining something they are both vying for. For complete disengagement they just don't overlap.
I also like 5 as a good number of factions; alignment-wise arranged in a pentagon, each faction with two ally and two enemy factions and everyone with at least some conflict of interest. This is how colors in MtG are aligned.
Brilliant!
is there an easy digital tool to make these?
Any digital drawing software should work!
I am trying this more or less right now and was wondering; have you considered having factions be hesitant towards each other?
That seems like a good option! Though I like the idea of there being something they're both interested in and it kind being a stalemate of sorts, a cold war per se. Both sides waiting to make the first move but still defining something they are both vying for. For complete disengagement they just don't overlap.
beautiful idea! I like the graphical simplicity of it. Thanks for sharing!
Thank you!
I also like 5 as a good number of factions; alignment-wise arranged in a pentagon, each faction with two ally and two enemy factions and everyone with at least some conflict of interest. This is how colors in MtG are aligned.
Yeah I feel like that’s plenty to power a campaign! Also gives PCs plenty choices of what to engage with but not too many!
Fabulous concept, I will certainly be making use of this going forward! And thank you for the mention, much obliged.
Fantastic to hear! And no problem, the sea fortress deserved a call out